2020 The Reconstruction of Kaidah Al-TazKir And Al-Ta’nis In Paradigm of Gender Equality Interpretation: Perbedaan antara revisi
Tampilan
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
||
| (2 revisi perantara oleh pengguna yang sama tidak ditampilkan) | |||
| Baris 29: | Baris 29: | ||
'''''Keywords:''' kesetaraan gender, rekonstruksi, al-ta’nith, al-tadhkir'' | '''''Keywords:''' kesetaraan gender, rekonstruksi, al-ta’nith, al-tadhkir'' | ||
'''Abstract''' | '''''Abstract''''' | ||
The rules of ''al-tazkîr'' and ''al-ta'nîs\'' (masculinity and femininity) formulated by classical interpretation don’t adhere to the principle of equality. This is triggered by exclusivity of men as a necessity of applying these rules, which causes superiority of male (''muzakkar'') and inferiority of women (''mu'annas''). This paper aims to illustrate the rules of ''al-tazkîr'' and ''al-ta'nîs'' in the classical period, how the current reconstruction was, and what motives inspired the reconstruction. With Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific revolution, this literature research finds that the rule of ''al-taz\kîr'' and ''al-ta'nîs\'' was originally adopted from Arabic grammar, and it’s full of male superiority. Then, experiencing a shift, which was initially partial because it was only oriented towards language, into a theory of equality with its various forms that were more responsive to women. The theories chronologically include ''maqasid musawah'' (Ibn 'Ashur, w. 1973), the reciprocal theory of the Prophet's hadith (Abu Shuqqah, w. 1995), and ''Qira'ah Mubadalah'' (Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir). In addition, the motive for this shift is that the rule of ''al-tazkîr'' and ''al-ta'nîs'' is unable to answer the problem of gender inequality, so reconstruction efforts need to be carried out. | The rules of ''al-tazkîr'' and ''al-ta'nîs\'' (masculinity and femininity) formulated by classical interpretation don’t adhere to the principle of equality. This is triggered by exclusivity of men as a necessity of applying these rules, which causes superiority of male (''muzakkar'') and inferiority of women (''mu'annas''). This paper aims to illustrate the rules of ''al-tazkîr'' and ''al-ta'nîs'' in the classical period, how the current reconstruction was, and what motives inspired the reconstruction. With Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific revolution, this literature research finds that the rule of ''al-taz\kîr'' and ''al-ta'nîs\'' was originally adopted from Arabic grammar, and it’s full of male superiority. Then, experiencing a shift, which was initially partial because it was only oriented towards language, into a theory of equality with its various forms that were more responsive to women. The theories chronologically include ''maqasid musawah'' (Ibn 'Ashur, w. 1973), the reciprocal theory of the Prophet's hadith (Abu Shuqqah, w. 1995), and ''Qira'ah Mubadalah'' (Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir). In addition, the motive for this shift is that the rule of ''al-tazkîr'' and ''al-ta'nîs'' is unable to answer the problem of gender inequality, so reconstruction efforts need to be carried out. | ||
| Baris 39: | Baris 39: | ||
[[Kategori:Artikel Jurnal]] | [[Kategori:Artikel Jurnal]] | ||
[[Kategori:Artikel Jurnal Mubadalah]] | [[Kategori:Artikel Jurnal Mubadalah]] | ||
[[Kategori:Artikel Jurnal Mubadalah 2020]] | |||